Free Self-Assessment
12 questions on agility, team and risk. Rated against published agile maturity models — with a personal assessment and concrete areas for action.
This assessment was generated from your answers by a language model and has not been editorially reviewed. It is an orientation, not legal or professional advice.
A project counts as healthy for as long as the status report stays green. That is precisely the problem: the report measures what gets reported, not what happens. Projects rarely fail suddenly — they fail slowly, and the signs show up weeks earlier in behaviour everyone sees and nobody writes down.
So this check asks about behaviour rather than opinion. Not “is communication good?”, but what actually happened the last time something went wrong. Twelve questions, three dimensions, answer options anchored in behaviour.
Nothing. Twelve questions, about five minutes, and the result appears directly on screen. Name and email are asked for so the evaluation is also available by email.
The Agile Maturity Index (Sidky et al., 2007) and the Agile Adoption Framework (Qumer & Henderson-Sellers, 2008). The questions draw on PRINCE2 and AgilePM. Both models describe maturity in stages rather than as a yes-or-no test.
Yes. Two of the three dimensions — team and risk — assume no agile approach at all. The agility dimension does not measure whether Scrum is in use, but whether change reaches the project before it is too late. That question is just as meaningful in a waterfall setting.
No, and it is not meant to be. One person answers twelve questions from their own vantage point — that is a hypothesis, not a diagnosis. The value appears when several people involved take the same check and discuss where their answers diverge. That gap is usually the real finding.
Look at the weakest dimension first, not the overall score. A low control score cannot be fixed with more meetings, and a low communication score cannot be fixed with another tool. The evaluation names a concrete area to act on for each dimension.